**This is an old revision of the document!**
Table of Contents

Why would someone join a religious commune?
Why would someone join a religious commune?
Ryan Schram
Mills 169 (A26)
ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au
March 26, 2015
Readings
Palmer, Susan J. 2010. “The Twelve Tribes: Preparing the Bride for Yahshua’s Return.” Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions 13 (3): 59–80. doi:10.1525/nr.2010.13.3.59.
Recommended reading
Bell, Catherine. 2009. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions–Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haddon, Malcolm. 2013. “Anthropological Proselytism: Reflexive Questions for a Hare Krishna Ethnography.” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 24 (3): 250–69. doi:10.1111/taja.12050.
Other media
“The Twelve Tribes: The Official Website of the Twelve Tribes Communities.” 2013. http://twelvetribes.org/. Accessed 2 February 2015.
Durkheim and Weber, two daimons on my shoulders
I like to think of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber as two little daimons who sit on each of my shoulders, each whispering different things in my ears.
- Durkheim looks at society as a totality.
- Weber looks at society as something that develops out individual patterns of action.
- Durkheim says that patterns of action are social facts. That is why they matter.
- Weber says that social patterns and institutions form because social actions have a meaning to the actor and to the society at large. Social institutions and structures are particualr ways of embodying all the things that people in society value.
Types of social action
- Traditional: Like a habit or an unquestioned rule.
- Affective: Emotionally motivated action, personally meaningful action.
- Value-rational: The pursuit of a collective good or goal.
- Instrumentally rational: Getting the best deal. Means-ends calculation.
For Weber some actions, and some societies, are more rational than others. This is how Ortner looks at avoidance of pollution. It is a “rational” way of acting. It is an effort to make sense of the world and one's place in it. For Weberians, religion in general is a very important and very special type of social action.
A brief, selective history of US Christianity and US counterculture
- The millennium in religious history.
- “Great awakenings,” Shakers, and Millerites
- German Romanticism and the birth of Californian culture
- The Jesus People and the Twelve Tribes
In other words...
In other words, I am arguing that the Twelve Tribes owes its origins to movements that also lead to Whole Foods, Food Not Bombs, Seventh Day Adventists and the Latter Day Saints (“Mormons”).
What do all these things have in common?
Max Weber, key ideas about religion
- Rationality. Some religions, like any form of social action, are more “rational” than others. People think more about them, and work out more explicitly why they make sense as a means to an end.
- Charisma, tradition and authority. Much as Weber discusses social action in terms of the motivations underlying it, he also seeks to distinguish the different bases on which people accept things as true, convincing, legitimate. Accepting something because it is traditional, or because it's the law, is different than feeling inspired to believe in something.
- Prophecy about the future millennium can shake people out of one way of reasoning about their actions and inspire them to seek meaning in something else.
- Salvation of one's soul can be more motivating than seeking to obey traditional rules.
## Max Weber's types of religions ##
- The first distinction: magical religions (do ut des) and rational-ethical religions.
- An axis of variation in ethical religions: mystical orientation versus ascetic orientation.
- Another axis: this-worldly orientation versus other-worldly orientation.
- contemplation: Gnostic Christians, New Age religions, charismatic healers.
- dissociation: trance, meditation
- ascetic world-rejection: Christian hermits, Hindu mendicants, quietism.
- ascetic mastery: Calvinist Protestants… and Ben Franklin. (Weber 1946 [1915]: 325)
A table of four types of religion
mystical | ascetic | |
---|---|---|
this-worldly | Improve the world | Control the world, starting with yourself. |
other-worldly | Abandon the world | Renounce the world. |
(after Bell 2009: 178 and Weber 1946 [1915]: 325)
How useful is this scheme of classification?
- Where would you put Rastafarians?
- Where would you put Hare Krishna?
- Where would you put Branch Davidians (followers of David Koresh of Waco, Texas)?
- Where would put John Frum followers (a 'cargo cult' on Tanna Island, Vanuatu)?
- Where would you put the Twelve Tribes?
References
Bell, Catherine. 2009. Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions–Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max. 1946. “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited by C. Wright Mills and H. H. Gerth, 323–59. New York: Oxford University Press.
A guide to the unit
ANTH 2667: The anthropology of religion—a guide to the unit