- Special projects (requires login)
ANTH 2700: Key debates in anthropology
Social Sciences Building 410 (A02)
Week of March 15, 2021 (Week 3)
Slides available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2700/2021/3
Main reading: Trouillot ([2003b] 2016)
Other reading: Trouillot ([2003a] 2016); Wolf (1984); Gilberthorpe (2007); Stasch (2015)
The idea of homo duplex is core to 20th century social science:
A question to consider in the course of this lecture: Is there a bias influenced by the political context in which these authors are working?
The split subject is a new view of human nature.
We can now look at different ways of life without placing them on a scale of more human and less human, more civilized and less civilized, etc.
Anthropology’s split subject takes us to the boundary between nature and culture.
The split subject has precursors in European thought. Consider Rousseau’s concept of “the natural state of man” (Rousseau  1964, 104):
[Man in the state of nature is] satisfying his hunger under an oak, quenching his thirst at the first stream, finding his bed at the foot of the same tree that furnished his meal; and therewith his needs are satisfied. (Rousseau  1964, 105)
While parts of Rousseau’s ideas have influenced the later development of anthropology, they are not the same as anthropology’s ideas about human universals.
Questions for tutorial: Anthropology has never said that some people are closer to nature than others. Does anthropology have its own idea of a noble savage? What is it? What does that mean for anthropology?
Edward Said, in his book Orientalism ( 2014), argues that European thinking about their own society is implicitly based on a dichotomy between “The East” and “The West.”
Rousseau’s “Savage” is another kind of Orientalism (Rousseau  1964, 179). (Some call it “primitivism.”) The noble savage is the opposite of the European citizen.
A sidebar: Star Trek has always had a strange fascination with anthropology:
Every week, there’s a new planet, with aliens who
The aliens of each planet characters are stereotypes of their “cultures”:
If each world is a culture, then it is because the writers assume that cultures are like worlds, or islands; each planet is a self-contained unity.
Spaceships are a great plot device.
Johannes Fabian finds the same kind of device in ethnographic writing. He calls it the “denial of coevalness” (Fabian 1983, 31).
Both anthropology and Star Trek share a similar kind of imagination of cultural difference. Anthropology and Star Trek both occupy a space in the imagination of the world found in European and Western societies. They provide an image which is the dichotomous opposite of Europeans and Westerners collective representation of themselves.
Eric Wolf has argued that anthropology has long assumed that each society it studies is a “static primitive isolate” that exists outside of historical time (Wolf 1984, 394).
Immanuel Wallerstein (1974) theorizes what he calls the capitalist world-system.
Eric Wolf (1982) notes that anthropology’s separation from sociology is influenced by the same ideology.
Example: Native North American societies and the 17th century fur trade
Durkheim, Emile. (1895) 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. Edited by Steven Lukes. London: The Macmillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9.
Fabian, Johannes. 1983. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press. http://books.google.com?id=OMnbAgAAQBAJ.
Gilberthorpe, Emma. 2007. “Fasu Solidarity: A Case Study of Kin Networks, Land Tenure, and Oil Extraction in Kutubu, Papua New Guinea.” American Anthropologist 109 (1): 101–12. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.1.101.
Jones, Tegan. 2013. “The History of Pac-Man.” Today I Found Out. August 16, 2013. http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2013/08/the-history-of-pac-man/.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. (1755) 1964. “Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men [The Second Discourse].” In The First and Second Discourses, edited by Roger D. Masters, translated by Roger D. Masters and Judith R. Masters, 77–228. New York: St. Martin’s Press. http://archive.org/details/firstseconddisco00rousrich.
Said, Edward W. (1978) 2014. Orientalism. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1986. Course in General Linguistics. Edited by Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, and Albert Riedlinger. LaSalle, Ill. : Open Court. http://archive.org/details/courseingenerall00sausrich.
Stasch, Rupert. 2015. “How an Egalitarian Polity Structures Tourism and Restructures Itself Around It.” Ethnos 80 (4): 524–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2014.942226.
Trouillot, Michel-Rolph. (2003a) 2016. “Adieu, Culture: A New Duty Arises.” In Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World, 97–116. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-137-04144-9.
———. (2003b) 2016. “Anthropology and the Savage Slot: The Poetics and Politics of Otherness.” In Global Transformations: Anthropology and the Modern World, 7–28. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-137-04144-9.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System, Vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
Wolf, Eric R. 1982. Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1984. “Culture: Panacea or Problem?” American Antiquity 49 (2): 393–400. http://www.jstor.org/stable/280026.