Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


talks:sanguma:aaa

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talks:sanguma:aaa [2019/10/21 15:39] Ryan Schram (admin)talks:sanguma:aaa [2020/01/25 15:28] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-~~DECKJS web2.0~~+~~DECKJS web-2.0~~
 # "Sanguma em i stap": Ethnographic citizenship and epistemic exclusion in Tok Pisin sorcery stories since 1945 # "Sanguma em i stap": Ethnographic citizenship and epistemic exclusion in Tok Pisin sorcery stories since 1945
  
Line 6: Line 6:
 Ryan Schram   Ryan Schram  
 University of Sydney   University of Sydney  
-October 20, 2019+October 25, 2019
  
-To be presented in the session "Making the occult public" at the 2019 meeting of the American Anthropological Association. (Please do not cite or quote without permission from the author.)+To be presented in the session "Making the occult public" at the 2019 meeting of the American Anthropological Association on Saturday, November 23, 4:15–6 p.m(Convention Center West, Room 306)
  
-Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/talks/sanguma/aaa+{{ :talks:sanguma:schram_sanguma_script_22oct19.pdf |Paper}} and [[|slides]] available at http://anthro.rschram.org/talks/sanguma/aaa. (Please do not cite or quote without permission from the author.)
  
 **Abstract:** In Papua New Guinea, people's political participation takes place in contact zones among many different cultures, and public discourse circulates only when people create interfaces between disparate languages, systems of knowledge, and value orientations. Citizenship rests on one's capacity to translate oneself; yet translations are not treated equally in mass print media. In the same way that the national creole language Tok Pisin is subject to competing ideological evaluations about the nature of multilingualism, Tok Pisin public discourse is characterized by competing tendencies toward epistemic inclusion and exclusion. In this paper, I present several different frames found in Tok Pisin public discourse which privilege different epistemological positions on sorcery and other occult topics. In each case, talk of the occult involves both an openness to differences in knowledge and a tendency to treat particular knowledge claims as beliefs (*bilip*) to be overcome. While *bilip* has become the dominant way to constrain public talk about the occult, I also show that the *bilip* can be reinterpreted to index a moral stance of mutual recognition of differences as well. Competing tendencies of inclusion and exclusion in Tok Pisin discourse also feed into and reinforce each other. The struggle over ontological recognition will thus always be a part of creole cosmopolitanism in PNG. **Keywords:** occult, belief, creoles and pidgins, media, citizenship.  **Abstract:** In Papua New Guinea, people's political participation takes place in contact zones among many different cultures, and public discourse circulates only when people create interfaces between disparate languages, systems of knowledge, and value orientations. Citizenship rests on one's capacity to translate oneself; yet translations are not treated equally in mass print media. In the same way that the national creole language Tok Pisin is subject to competing ideological evaluations about the nature of multilingualism, Tok Pisin public discourse is characterized by competing tendencies toward epistemic inclusion and exclusion. In this paper, I present several different frames found in Tok Pisin public discourse which privilege different epistemological positions on sorcery and other occult topics. In each case, talk of the occult involves both an openness to differences in knowledge and a tendency to treat particular knowledge claims as beliefs (*bilip*) to be overcome. While *bilip* has become the dominant way to constrain public talk about the occult, I also show that the *bilip* can be reinterpreted to index a moral stance of mutual recognition of differences as well. Competing tendencies of inclusion and exclusion in Tok Pisin discourse also feed into and reinforce each other. The struggle over ontological recognition will thus always be a part of creole cosmopolitanism in PNG. **Keywords:** occult, belief, creoles and pidgins, media, citizenship. 
Line 30: Line 30:
 2. the typification of the persons who occupy these meeting places as a basis for containing, commensurating, and ranking differences among them.  2. the typification of the persons who occupy these meeting places as a basis for containing, commensurating, and ranking differences among them. 
  
-## The politics of language in PNG+## Tok Pisin and the politics of knowledge in PNG
  
 * Jourdan and Angeli (2014) argue that both the ideologies of reciprocal and hierarchical multilingualism determine the public role of pidgins and creoles. * Jourdan and Angeli (2014) argue that both the ideologies of reciprocal and hierarchical multilingualism determine the public role of pidgins and creoles.
Line 46: Line 46:
  
 * It embraces Tok Pisin as a grassroots language for a new nation. * It embraces Tok Pisin as a grassroots language for a new nation.
-* It strives to conform to the model of mass journalism as an anonymous voice from nowhere,+* It strives to conform to the model of mass journalism as an anonymous voice from nowhere, and thus tends to favor official sources as "authorized knowers" (Tuchman 1978; Fishman 1978).
  
 ## A 2012 article in Wantok ## A 2012 article in Wantok
Line 57: Line 57:
 <td style="padding-right:0.5em;"> <td style="padding-right:0.5em;">
  
-Long PNG, <strong>bilip</strong> bilong posin, sanguma, marila o puripuri i bikpela tru long planti rurel komyuniti. Maski wol i stap insait long 21 Senseri we bikpela senis i wok long kamap insait long wol dispela bilip i stap strong yet long planti rurel komyuniti long PNG.+Long PNG, <strong>bilip</strong> bilong posin, sanguma, marila o puripuri i bikpela tru long planti rurel komyuniti. Maski wol i stap insait long 21 Senseri we bikpela senis i wok long kamap insait long wol dispela <strong>bilip</strong> i stap strong yet long planti rurel komyuniti long PNG.
  
 </td> </td>
 <td style="padding-left:0.5em;"> <td style="padding-left:0.5em;">
  
-In PNG, the <strong>belief</strong> in <em>posin</em>, <em>sanguma</em>, <em>marila</em>, or <em>puripuri</em> is very important in many rural communities. Even though the world is in the 21st century, and major changes are happening around the world, this belief still remains powerful in many rural communities of PNG. (Emphasis added.)+In PNG, the <strong>belief</strong> in <em>posin</em>, <em>sanguma</em>, <em>marila</em>, or <em>puripuri</em> is very important in many rural communities. Even though the world is in the 21st century, and major changes are happening around the world, this <strong>belief</strong> still remains powerful in many rural communities of PNG. (Emphasis added.)
  
 </td> </td>
Line 70: Line 70:
  
 ## The two sides of belief ## The two sides of belief
 +
 +Per Robbins (2007), both //belief// (English) and //bilip// (Tok Pisin) have two distinct senses: 
 +
 +### English 
  
 * Belief that... * Belief that...
 * Belief in... * Belief in...
 +
 +### Tok Pisin 
 +
 +* Bilip olsem...
 +* Bilip long...
  
 ## A 1988 Simbu Nius article ## A 1988 Simbu Nius article
  
-### "Masalai kilim man indai [Spirit kills man]" (Daka 1988)+### Lead paragraph of "Masalai kilim man indai [Spirit kills man]" (Daka 1988)
  
 <html> <html>
Line 123: Line 132:
  
 * The children take the victim to the nurse; the nurse finds nothing wrong. * The children take the victim to the nurse; the nurse finds nothing wrong.
-* At his home, people outside see a group of spirits at the door; the people inside see nothing.  +* The man dies. 
-* The man dies+* At his home, people outside see a //lain masalai// (group of spiritsat the door; the people inside see nothing.
 * Two other unrelated examples of sudden, unexplained deaths are mentioned * Two other unrelated examples of sudden, unexplained deaths are mentioned
  
Line 148: Line 157:
 ## Conclusion: PNG's complex civic competences ## Conclusion: PNG's complex civic competences
  
-* Ontological micropolitics (Straight 2008)  +* Ontological micropolitics (Straight 2008) 
-Or, the alienation of people's epistemological labor+Epistemic exclusion (Daukas 2006) 
 +  * e.g. the normative"information-based model of civic competence" excludes people's experiences (Cramer and Toff 2017) 
 +* In PNG, one also finds that exclusion entails the alienation of people's epistemological labor
  
  
Line 157: Line 168:
  
 Arnold, Michael. 2017. “Community Rallies to Weed out Sorcerers.” The Papua New Guinea Post-Courier, November 7, 2017. https://postcourier.com.pg/community-rallies-weed-sorcerers/. Arnold, Michael. 2017. “Community Rallies to Weed out Sorcerers.” The Papua New Guinea Post-Courier, November 7, 2017. https://postcourier.com.pg/community-rallies-weed-sorcerers/.
 +
 +Cramer, Katherine J., and Benjamin Toff. 2017. “The Fact of Experience: Rethinking Political Knowledge and Civic Competence.” Perspectives on Politics 15 (3): 754–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000949.
  
 Daka, Agua. 1988. “Masalai Kilim Man Indai.” Simbu Nius, June 1988. Daka, Agua. 1988. “Masalai Kilim Man Indai.” Simbu Nius, June 1988.
 +
 +Daukas, Nancy. 2006. “Epistemic Trust and Social Location.” Episteme 3 (1–2): 109–24. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.109.
 +
 +Fishman, Mark. 1978. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  
 Gibbs, Philip. 2015. “Wok Long Painim Gutpela Sindaun Long Bogenvil.” Wantok Niuspepa, July 30, 2015. Gibbs, Philip. 2015. “Wok Long Painim Gutpela Sindaun Long Bogenvil.” Wantok Niuspepa, July 30, 2015.
Line 168: Line 185:
 ———. 1992. “Semantic Ascent.” In The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, edited by Richard Rorty, 168–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 1992. “Semantic Ascent.” In The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method, edited by Richard Rorty, 168–72. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  
-StraightBilinda2008. “Killing GodExceptional Moments in the Colonial Missionary Encounter.” Current Anthropology 49 (5): 83760. https://doi.org/10.1086/591423.+RobbinsJoel2007. “Continuity Thinking and the Problem of Christian CultureBelief, Time, and the Anthropology of Christianity.” Current Anthropology 48 (1): 538. https://doi.org/10.1086/508690.
  
 +Tuchman, Gaye. 1978. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
 +
 +Straight, Bilinda. 2008. “Killing God: Exceptional Moments in the Colonial Missionary Encounter.” Current Anthropology 49 (5): 837–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/591423.
  
 Yakai, Mathew. 2012. “Bilip Bilong Posin Sanguma Daunim Divelopmen.” Wantok Niuspepa, September 6, 2012. Yakai, Mathew. 2012. “Bilip Bilong Posin Sanguma Daunim Divelopmen.” Wantok Niuspepa, September 6, 2012.
  
talks/sanguma/aaa.1571697546.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/10/21 15:39 by Ryan Schram (admin)