2654:2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2654:2 [2014/08/04 21:49] – [References] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2654:2 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ||
- | August | + | August |
Available at http:// | Available at http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Alternative classrooms ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## A new kind of lecture ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | The " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why do people want to do this? | ||
+ | |||
+ | What do you think this would be like as a student? | ||
+ | |||
+ | How does this work in anthropology? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kinship live ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | What makes these TV shows popular? What do audiences see in them? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kinship as a classification system ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Henry Maine: status, contract | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lewis Henry Morgan: gens, state. | ||
+ | |||
+ | W. H. R. Rivers: The genealogical method, an inventory of social statuses. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
## " | ## " | ||
Line 25: | Line 62: | ||
Anthropology aspires to become a mathematics of society. Should it? | Anthropology aspires to become a mathematics of society. Should it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Key terms ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Consanguineous**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Affinal**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Filiation**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Descent**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kiriwina ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | The peoples of Kiriwina, Kitava and the other Trobriand Islands belong to //dala//, a group based on **matrilineal** descent. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A person in this society is a member of their mother' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ||
- | **Malinowski**: | + | **Malinowski**: |
We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | ||
Line 36: | Line 91: | ||
We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | ||
- | ## Two more perspectives | + | ## The axiom of amity ## |
- | There is a common core to all kinship systems, based on universal traits. These can be innate, inherited qualities, or they could be universal requirements of group membership. | + | **Meyer Fortes**: |
- | There are no necessary elements | + | > Kinship concepts, institutions, |
- | ## Some more terms ## | ||
- | **Filiation**: | ||
- | **Descent**: | ||
- | ## Kiriwina ## | ||
- | The peoples of Kiriwina, Kitava and the other Trobriand Islands belong to //dala//, a group based on **matrilineal** descent. | ||
- | A person in this society is a member of their mother' | + | ## Postscript ## |
+ | This is the region where Susana de Matos Viegas carried out field research in Bahia, Brazil: https:// | ||
- | ## Why have fathers? ## | ||
- | |||
- | Well? | ||
## References ## | ## References ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge. | ||
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “17. Kinship.” Man 30: 19–29. doi: | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “17. Kinship.” Man 30: 19–29. doi: |
2654/2.1407214167.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/08/04 21:49 by Ryan Schram (admin)