2654:2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2654:2 [2014/08/04 21:33] – [Two ideas, two perspectives] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2654:2 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ||
| - | August | + | August |
| Available at http:// | Available at http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Alternative classrooms ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## A new kind of lecture ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | The " | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why do people want to do this? | ||
| + | |||
| + | What do you think this would be like as a student? | ||
| + | |||
| + | How does this work in anthropology? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ## Kinship live ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | What makes these TV shows popular? What do audiences see in them? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Kinship as a classification system ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | Henry Maine: status, contract | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lewis Henry Morgan: gens, state. | ||
| + | |||
| + | W. H. R. Rivers: The genealogical method, an inventory of social statuses. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| ## " | ## " | ||
| - | Malinowski | + | Bronislaw |
| + | |||
| + | In a 1930 paper in the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (then called //Man//), he wrote: | ||
| + | |||
| + | > [I have my doubts] whether the effort needed to master the bastard algebra of kinship is really worth while. [...] | ||
| + | > After all, kinship is a matter of flesh and blood, the result of sexual passion and maternal affection, of long | ||
| + | > intimate daily life, and of a host of personal intimate interests. Can all this really be reduced to formulas | ||
| + | > symbols, perhaps equations? (1930: 19) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Anthropology aspires to become a mathematics of society. Should it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Key terms ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Consanguineous**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Affinal**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Filiation**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Descent**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ## Kiriwina ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | The peoples of Kiriwina, Kitava and the other Trobriand Islands belong to //dala//, a group based on **matrilineal** descent. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A person in this society is a member of their mother' | ||
| + | |||
| ## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ||
| - | **Malinowski**: | + | **Malinowski**: |
| We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | ||
| Line 27: | Line 91: | ||
| We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | ||
| - | ## Two more perspectives | + | ## The axiom of amity ## |
| - | There is a common core to all kinship systems, based on universal traits. These can be innate, inherited qualities, or they could be universal requirements of group membership. | + | **Meyer Fortes**: |
| - | There are no necessary elements | + | > Kinship concepts, institutions, |
| - | ## Some more terms ## | ||
| - | **Filiation**: | ||
| - | **Descent**: | ||
| - | ## Why have fathers? ## | ||
| - | Well? | + | |
| + | ## Postscript ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the region where Susana de Matos Viegas carried out field research in Bahia, Brazil: https:// | ||
| ## References ## | ## References ## | ||
| + | |||
| + | Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “17. Kinship.” Man 30: 19–29. doi: | ||
| Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1932 [1922]. Argonauts of The Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd. http:// | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1932 [1922]. Argonauts of The Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd. http:// | ||
2654/2.1407213232.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/08/04 21:33 by Ryan Schram (admin)