2654:2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
2654:2 [2014/08/04 21:31] – created Ryan Schram (admin) | 2654:2 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ||
- | August | + | August |
Available at http:// | Available at http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Alternative classrooms ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## A new kind of lecture ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | The " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why do people want to do this? | ||
+ | |||
+ | What do you think this would be like as a student? | ||
+ | |||
+ | How does this work in anthropology? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kinship live ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | What makes these TV shows popular? What do audiences see in them? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kinship as a classification system ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Henry Maine: status, contract | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lewis Henry Morgan: gens, state. | ||
+ | |||
+ | W. H. R. Rivers: The genealogical method, an inventory of social statuses. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
## " | ## " | ||
- | Malinowski | + | Bronislaw |
+ | |||
+ | In a 1930 paper in the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (then called //Man//), he wrote: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > [I have my doubts] whether the effort needed to master the bastard algebra of kinship is really worth while. [...] | ||
+ | > After all, kinship is a matter of flesh and blood, the result of sexual passion and maternal affection, of long | ||
+ | > intimate daily life, and of a host of personal intimate interests. Can all this really be reduced to formulas | ||
+ | > symbols, perhaps equations? (1930: 19) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Anthropology aspires to become a mathematics of society. Should it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Key terms ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Consanguineous**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Affinal**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Filiation**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Descent**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kiriwina ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | The peoples of Kiriwina, Kitava and the other Trobriand Islands belong to //dala//, a group based on **matrilineal** descent. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A person in this society is a member of their mother' | ||
+ | |||
## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ## Two ideas, two perspectives ## | ||
- | **Malinowski**: | + | **Malinowski**: |
- | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | + | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' |
**Morgan**: Kinship systems are derived from the kinds of property that people can own. More generally, kinship is a way for a group to organize its members into different groups. | **Morgan**: Kinship systems are derived from the kinds of property that people can own. More generally, kinship is a way for a group to organize its members into different groups. | ||
Line 27: | Line 91: | ||
We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | ||
- | ## Two more perspectives | + | ## The axiom of amity ## |
- | There is a common core to all kinship systems, based on universal traits. These can be innate, inherited qualities, or they could be universal requirements of group membership. | + | **Meyer Fortes**: |
- | There are no necessary elements | + | > Kinship concepts, institutions, |
- | ## Some more terms ## | ||
- | **Filiation**: | ||
- | **Descent**: A principle of kin reckoning, especially for purposes | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## Postscript ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the region where Susana de Matos Viegas carried out field research in Bahia, Brazil: https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## References ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy | ||
+ | |||
+ | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “17. Kinship.” Man 30: 19–29. doi: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1932 [1922]. Argonauts of The Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure |
2654/2.1407213103.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/08/04 21:31 by Ryan Schram (admin)