Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- the_quest:building_an_argument [2015/01/24 23:34] – [The Parthenon] Ryan Schram (admin)
+++ the_quest:building_an_argument [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 # Building an argument #
-An argument supports a thesis. An argument is a lot like a building. In fact it is a lot like the Parthenon of Ancient Athens! The thesis statement is the roof, visible for miles around. The building is made from the raw material of facts that you have discovered through reading on your topic. But a building also has a design. Raw material does not hold up a roof by itself. It needs an architect to design a strong structure.((I told you this was Greek stuff. This is an instance of hylomorphism, or the principle that everything consists of both matter and form. Thanks, Aristotle!))
+An argument supports a thesis. An argument is a lot like a building. In fact it is a lot like the Parthenon of ancient Athens! The thesis statement is the roof, visible for miles around. The building is made from the raw material of facts that you have discovered through reading on your topic. But a building also has a design. Raw material does not hold up a roof by itself. It needs an architect to design a strong structure.((I told you this was Greek stuff. This is an instance of hylomorphism, or the principle that everything consists of both matter and form. Thanks, Aristotle!))
 ## The Parthenon ##
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
     ---------------------------------------
-So as you can see, there is a logical structure at work here. You have facts on your topic, and you know that these facts are problematic. They need an explanation. Some of the facts seem to hang together, to indicate something more. They are evidence of something. In order to use facts as evidence, you must also explain your reasons why the facts in this case support the larger claim of the paper. That’s the warrant. The warrant is, basically, an assumption about how the world works. In this way, it serves as a lens with which to view facts and draw conclusions from them. In other words, Durkheim, Weber, Marx (or, in [[2667|ANTH 2667]] Ortner, Douglas), and so on… the great theorists of religion and society. The ones with all the Big Ideas. We read them because they give us warrants for drawing our own conclusions.
+So as you can see, there is a logical structure at work here. You have facts on your topic, and you know that these facts are problematic. They need an explanation. Some of the facts seem to hang together, to indicate something more. They are evidence of something. In order to use facts as evidence, you must also explain your reasons why the facts in this case support the larger claim of the paper. That’s the warrant. The warrant is, basically, an assumption about how the world works. In this way, it serves as a lens with which to view facts and draw conclusions from them. In other words, Durkheim, Weber, Marx (or, in [[:2667:start|ANTH 2667]] Ortner, Douglas), and so on… the great theorists of religion and society. The ones with all the Big Ideas. We read them because they give us warrants for drawing our own conclusions.
 ## Don't wait to get started - Build your Parthenon on paper ##