Site frozen. Go to Anthrograph for the latest [July 4, 2025]

I am pleased to announce that I am debuting a new site for teaching resources at https://anthrograph.rschram.org. Please visit and browse.

The Anthrocyclopaedia will remain for now as an archive but will no longer be updated. I will be manually moving materials from this site to Anthrograph from today, editing and updating as I go. Thanks for your visits over the many years---over 10!---that this site has been active. I look forward to welcoming you to a new teaching site.

Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: start » symbol
symbol

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
symbol [2020/03/22 15:36] – created Ryan Schram (admin)symbol [2021/06/29 02:31] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 # Symbol  # Symbol 
  
-A symbol is something that stands for something else. The term symbol is one of many people use to talk about communication, including verbal and nonverbal communication. Another, more general term is sign. While some scholars [[http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/|use these and other terms in a rigorous way]] to analyze communication, it helps to talk about them more generally at first.  +A symbol is something that stands for something else. The term symbol is one of many people use to talk about communication, including verbal and nonverbal communication. Another, more general term is sign. While some scholars [[http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/|use these and other terms in a rigorous way]] to analyze communication, it helps to talk about them more generally at first. 
 + 
 +Symbols are not the only mode of communication. We can make a provisional distinction between at least three kinds of signs 
 + 
 +* natural signs, e.g. when we see smoke, we think there's something burning. 
 +* iconic signs, i.e. things that represent something else by looking like what they represent, like a photograph or a painting.  
 +* conventional signs, e.g. the flag (and indeed the Southern Cross) makes us think of “Australia,” the OK sign means "OK" for English speakers, and the number 3 refers to a quantity.  
 + 
 +This is Charles Sanders Peirce's trichotomy of signs: index, icon, and symbol respectively (Atkin 2013). 
 + 
 +Yet, all signs in the real world have a mix of all three kinds of sign. For a cultural anthropologist, it is especially important to see the symbolic aspect in every kind of communication. Clearly, when we think of culture in a Boasian sense, we would also conclude that people acquire a vast number of conventional signs (symbols), just as they acquire a vast number of words for ideas when they learn a language. People also have to learn to read natural signs in conventional ways. Some of this is by gaining specific knowledge. For instance Auhelawa gardeners have to learn to read the falling of rosewood leaves as a sign of a new phase of yam gardening. The falling leaves are a natural sign of a seasonal change. The symbolic connection between leaves and yam harvesting is learned. Other kinds of apparently natural signs have one conventional meaning in one culture and another in another culture, and people have to acquire their culture's conventional way of reading them. In Auhelawa, people abstain from washing and wearing clean clothes when they are in mourning for a relative who belongs to another matrilineage (e.g. the wife and children of a man who dies, or the husband of a woman who dies). There is an indexical (natural) meaning of their dirty appearance in the sense that it is a direct outcome of their observance of a prohibition. Auhelawa people also read this index in a conventional way as a symbol of //ve'ahihi// (respect) for the matrilineal relatives of the deceased.  
 + 
 +A Boasian cultural anthropologist would emphasize the way that the symbolic aspects of signs determines how we read and understand the world. Think about police tape around a crime scene.  
 + 
 +{{ ::police-tape.jpg?400 |"NSW Police tape" 2019}} 
 + 
 +In some way, the space of crime scene is communicated by a natural sign: the tape marks the boundary. But imagine this from a purely etic perspective. Imagine being an alien from outer space. How do you know that this line should not be crossed? What's to say that it's not a finish line or a decorative ribbon? The markings on the tape are read symbolically, and would only make sense in an [[:emic_and_etic|emic]] perspective. The space of the crime scene is visible to someone with this emic perspective. In that sense also, //crime scene// is an emic category within the cultural worldview of New South Wales.  
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +## Reference 
 + 
 +Atkin, Albert. 2013. “Peirce’s Theory of Signs.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Summer 2013. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics/. 
 + 
 +“NSW Police Tape.” 2019. ABC News. May 21, 2019. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-21/police-tape-generic-nsw/11132618. 
 + 
symbol.1584916608.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/03/22 15:36 by Ryan Schram (admin)