Fulltext results:
- 3.1
- ~~DECKJS~~ ====== Systems of spheres compared ====== ===== Systems of spheres compared ===== ==== Week 3: Spheres of exchange, in ... s not have this revolutionizing effect on similar systems (Hoskins 1997, 186–88). ===== Why was Bohannan’s... mmodity coexist in every society. * These two systems are based on completely contrary ways of being an
- 8.2
- d procedures as the basis for social patterns and systems. * Social institutions become **more specialize... law and order are placed in the hands of specific systems. ==== Weber’s secularization thesis ==== As soc... h an ethnocentric lens: * Religion is a set of systems and institutions that flows from beliefs about th
- 2.1
- s not have this revolutionizing effect on similar systems (Hoskins 1997, 186–88). ===== References and fur
- 2.2
- s not have this revolutionizing effect on similar systems (Hoskins 1997, 186–88). ===== Commodities and ca
- 8.1
- ties think they are rational and modern, and have systems that keep emotional attachments (or superstitious
- 9.1
- ch other. Mary Douglas argues that societies are systems of classifications. * Dirt is not objective. D
- 2024
- (1996); Deomampo (2019) | |\\ | Aug 12 | 1. [[3.1|Systems of spheres compared]] | | |\\ | Aug 14 | 2. [[3.2