Fulltext results:
- 1 @2700:2021
- It seems like anthropologists don’t agree about anything. ===== Why can’t anthropologists agree on anything? ===== There are several different reasons. - Anthr
- 2 @2700:2021
- * The history of a language **does not** tell you anything about why people understand each other at one mom... nothing in //h//, //o//, //r//, or //s// that has anything to do with 🐎. **The relationship between the sign
- 1 @2700:2022
- It seems like anthropologists don’t agree about anything. ===== Why can’t anthropologists agree on anything? ===== There are several different reasons. - Anthr
- 2 @2700:2022
- * The history of a language **does not** tell you anything about why people understand each other at one mom... nothing in //h//, //o//, //r//, or //s// that has anything to do with 🐎. **The relationship between the sign
- 10 @2700:2022
- not stop you, deny you, force you, or make you do anything. It is you. Without your agency as an individual,... n system, for Lugardian thinking to take hold. If anything, its early experiments inspired him. * Princel
- 2 @2700:2025
- * The history of a language **does not** tell you anything about why people understand each other at one mom... nothing in //h//, //o//, //r//, or //s// that has anything to do with 🐎. **The relationship between the sign
- 7 @2700:2025
- rsue projects on that basis in parallel. What if anything did these two separate developments have to do wi
- 8 @2700:2025
- not stop you, deny you, force you, or make you do anything. It is you. Without your agency as an individual,
- 10 @2700:2025
- ce to a token. ===== When we talk or think about anything, we are always working with nested boxes =====
- weekly_writing_assignments @2700:2025
- ek’s submission is not scored, that does not mean anything is wrong or that you have lost points. It just me