Fulltext results:
- second_essay_who_represents_the_future_of_anthropology_and_why @2700:2025
- onnect this evidence to a larger conclusion about someone’s perspective. Keep in mind that this is an essa... ources is a minimal effort. * You should choose someone whose work has not been assigned for class. Ideal... . There is no way you can prove definitively that someone “is an anthropologist.” There is no absolute defi... You have to make a judgment about whether or not someone’s empirical research is relevant to anthropology,
- 7 @2700:2025
- ==== Everything anyone knows, they know because someone told them. But we don’t believe everything we he... n others. For Fricker (2007), * you can treat someone as an **informant**, that is, a person who is cap... f giving credible testimony; or * you can treat someone as a **source of information**, that is, someone from whom you can take information, but without regard to
- 8 @2700:2022
- * Weber’s view of power is that it is ability for someone to get someone else do something they would not otherwise do. * A bureaucracy has power because, Weber assumes, someone makes a decision, and the whole organization acts
- 1 @2700:2022
- wear to class * Choosing words when speaking to someone you just met These may seem like simple habits. But how do you feel when someone fails to do what people normally do? They may se
- 2 @2700:2021
- s **no good or correct** way to speak a language. Someone’s utterances either make sense or they don’t; **e
- 2 @2700:2022
- s **no good or correct** way to speak a language. Someone’s utterances either make sense or they don’t; **e
- 10 @2700:2022
- eds to be in the watchtower; the prisoners assume someone is there, and so they monitor themselves. ==== C
- 11 @2700:2022
- of alternative ontologies ===== Imagine you meet someone who says “I am a sea eagle” or “My yams respect m
- 13 @2700:2022
- ow, or * an act of an insane person, that is, someone who cannot be responsible for action. Groups als
- 2 @2700:2025
- s **no good or correct** way to speak a language. Someone’s utterances either make sense or they don’t; **e
- 8 @2700:2025
- eds to be in the watchtower; the prisoners assume someone is there, and so they monitor themselves. ==== C
- 10 @2700:2025
- og, cat, urban, modern, rural are **just labels** someone slaps on individual things. No ideal types exist:
- first_essay_improving_ai_reference_material @2700:2025
- t's good to see what it is not. To understand why someone's ideas are important, it's good to see how they
- possible_sources_for_the_second_essay @2700:2025
- ything can be relevant. You need to judge whether someone is engaged in the same conversations we have seen