emic_and_etic
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
emic_and_etic [2020/03/17 22:50] – [Emic and etic] Ryan Schram (admin) | emic_and_etic [2024/09/08 21:05] (current) – Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===== Analytic and synthetic perspectives ===== | ===== Analytic and synthetic perspectives ===== | ||
- | Here's another way to think about it: **etic** is to **emic** as **analysis** is to **synthesis**. | + | Here's another way to think about it: **etic** is to **emic** as **analysis** is to **synthesis**. The table below lists several emic concepts that Auhelawa people apply to their own lives (on the right) and several etic descriptions (on the left) of what these ideas include, based on Ryan's observation of how Auhelawa people live. |
- | < | ||
- | < | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | <td style=" | ||
- | oral historical narrative describing a lineage’s founding, migration, and descent | + | | oral historical narrative describing a lineage’s founding, migration, and descent |
+ | | mortuary feasting | bwabwale | | ||
+ | | the stylized expressions of deference and circumspection by certain relatives toward the matrilineal kin of a deceased person | veʻahihi (respect) | | ||
+ | | horticulture | [[: | ||
- | </ | + | ## Reference |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | tetela | + | Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. //Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior//. The Hague: Mouton and Co. |
- | </td> | ||
- | </tr> | ||
- | <tr> | ||
- | <td style=" | ||
- | mortuary feasting | + | ----- |
- | </td> | + | <WRAP box similar>~~SIMILAR~~</WRAP> |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | bwabwale | + | |
- | + | ||
- | </td> | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | the stylized expressions of deference and circumspection by certain relatives toward the matrilineal kin of a deceased person | + | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | veʻahihi (respect) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | < | + | |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | + | ||
- | horticulture | + | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
- | <td style=" | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | [[: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | </ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ## Reference | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Pike, Kenneth L. 1967. //Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior//. The Hague: Mouton and Co. | + | |
emic_and_etic.1584510652.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/03/17 22:50 by Ryan Schram (admin)