Ryan Schram
ANTH 1002: Anthropology in the world
Module 4, Week 3, Lecture 1
Social Sciences Building (A02), Room 410
ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au
November 4, 2019
Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/1002/2019/4.3.1
This week's topic is difficult because it will require us to talk about things that are uncomfortable. In fact, this is the point of this week's topic: One's own culture will teach people to ignore and suppress parts of their own experience. These things are still there, but we learn not to see them.
Let's try to create a space in this lecture so that we can reflect on the things that make us feel uncomfortable.
In Week 11, I discussed wailing as an example of cultural differences in the meaning of death in difference societies.
Seeing the symmetry of difference is important to anthropology, which always starts from a position of relativism. We must abandon the Portland coffee shop fantasy that some people are acultural and live in a world without any cultural programming (see Gershon 2012, 5).
People of Kwaio society live in the inland mountains of the island of Malaita in Solomon Islands (Keesing 1982a, 1982b). They have always defended what they call their kastam from Australian missionaries and colonial government. Kwaio kastam centers on
Kwaio society is another example in which the meaning of one person's death is determined by what happens to everyone else after that person dies and is buried and their skull is enshrined.
What is your response to this information?
Have you ever heard of anything like this?
What do you want to know about this situation?
The late twentieth century, at the end of the colonial period in Solomon Islands, was also a time for much more vigorous political demands by Kwaio men and women for their autonomy, including a recognition of their kastam as law for Kwaio.
The leading figures of this movement are now dead, and have become ancestors. As advocates for maintaining kastam, they now insist on strict adherence to the taboos
Kwaio society in the twenty-first century reveals another paradox:
In Kwaio society, ancestors possess great authority. Their choices and decisions as individual spirits have a great deal of influence on living descendants. Ancestors are also political actors, and continue to push for the same kinds of political decisions as they did when they were alive.
Many societies define death as the end of a life. In these societies, the dead do not have a say in what the living do. Why not? Why don't the dead have rights the way Kwaio ancestors do in Kwaio society?
In his study of people's emotional experiences and social behavior in Tahiti, Robert Levy (1973) introduces a useful conceptual distinction:
In last week's lecture, I argued that the value of choice in all things is an example of how people can be “forced to be free,” that is, compelled to play the role of the individual without social ties and obligations (Rousseau 1978 [1762], 55). In this perspective, what is another area where people are forced to be free?
Go to Canvas and take Quiz no. 22: Nothing left to lose. The code will be announced in lecture.
Akin, David. 2003. “Concealment, Confession, and Innovation in Kwaio Women’s Taboos.” American Ethnologist 30 (3): 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2003.30.3.381.
Awikiak, Glenda. 2019. “Hospital Wants People to Collect Bodies of Relatives.” The Papua New Guinea National, January 7, 2019. https://www.thenational.com.pg/hospital-wants-people-to-collect-bodies-of-relatives/.
Brook, Benedict. 2015. “The Station Where Only the Dead Depart.” News.Com.Au, October 16, 2015. https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-ideas/adventure/the-sydney-railway-station-designed-for-the-dead-is-to-be-opened-to-the-living/news-story/17c480c9d5c5c4cc992391117b8d119e#.wt7vi.
Dumont, Louis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Epstein, A. L. 1984. The Experience of Shame in Melanesia: An Essay in the Anthropology of Affect. London: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/002560429.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1976 (1937). Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Edited by Eva Gillies. Abridged edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gershon, Ilana. 2012. No Family Is an Island: Cultural Expertise among Samoans in Diaspora. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Keesing, Roger M. 1982a. Kwaio Religion: The Living and the Dead in a Solomon Island Society. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1982b. “Kastom and Anticolonialism on Malaita: ‘Culture’ as Political Symbol.” Mankind 13 (4): 357–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1982.tb01000.x.
Levy, Robert I. 1973. Tahitians: Mind and Experience in the Society Islands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Long, Susan Orpett. 2004. “Cultural Scripts for a Good Death in Japan and the United States: Similarities and Differences.” Social Science & Medicine, Good and Bad Death, 58 (5): 913–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.10.037.
Moore, Clive. 2015. “The Pacific Islanders’ Fund and the Misappropriation of the Wages of Deceased Pacific Islanders by the Queensland Government.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 61 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12083.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1978 (1762). On the Social Contract, with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy. Edited by Roger D. Masters. Translated by Judith R. Masters. New York: St. Martin’s Press. http://archive.org/details/onsocialcontract00rous.
Sydney Morning Herald. 1948. “New Park Planned,” April 9, 1948. http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article18067188.
Thomas, Cónal. 2019. “Woman Who Died in Direct Provision Buried without Ceremony before Friends Were Told.” TheJournal.Ie, June 5, 2019. https://www.thejournal.ie/sylva-direct-provision-death-burial-funeral-4668250-Jun2019/.