~~DECKJS~~

# Some history #

## A history of kinship ##

Ryan Schram 

ANTH 2654: Forms of Families

July 31, 2014

Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2654/1

## Who do you think you are? ##

http://www.sbs.com.au/programs/who-do-you-think-you-are

## Faces of America ##

* http://www.pbs.org/wnet/facesofamerica/
* http://www.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/

## Recap ##

There's lots of reasons to study kinship:

* It raises questions about human nature.

* It seems to explain the social structure of small societies.

* Ideas about family often reveal implicit ideas about gender and
  morality.

* "Multiculturalism" usually has something to do with the fact that
  different cultures have differ concepts of family, relatives, and
  their relationships.

You should choose one reason why you're studying it. What questions do
you want answered?

## He invented kinship ##

Many ideas about kinship in anthropology trace back to the work of
**[[:Lewis Henry Morgan]]**. Morgan gives the first justification for
studying kinship as a system of a society. 

Every society has its own way of dividing itself into groups and
deciding how these groups can relate to each other. The terms we use
to label relatives are classifications of people. 

## Morgan's definition of kinship ##

For Morgan, kinship is a "system of consanguinity and affinity."

**Consanguinity**: related by blood, either through the mother or the
father.

**Affinity**: related by marriage, i.e. a spouse and all of the
spouse's consanguineous relatives. Roughly equivalent to English
'in-law'.

## Set sail for kinship ## 

**[[:W. H. R. Rivers]]** is another "discoverer of kinship" in anthropology.

Rivers collected information about cultures by going out on long
expeditions. It was a time before "fieldwork."

He found that he could gather a clear picture of a society as an
organized whole if he just asked a person to name all of their
relatives, and to trace their family tree back as far as one could
remember. He called it **the genealogical method**.

Patterns of which relative married which relative were linked to
different types of social institution.

## Culture shock ##

Rivers helped create contemporary anthropology based on cultural
relativism. For him, marriage forms like **polyandry** and **child
marriage** were just as strange as **cousin marriage** among
upper-class British families.

## A puzzle ##

Take a piece of paper and write the term. What do you call:

* Your **mother's sister's children**?
* Your **mother's brother's children**?
* Your **mother's children** (besides yourself)?
* Your **father's sister's children**?
* Your **father's brother's children**?
* Your **father's children** (besides yourself)?

You can share answers with neighbors. What languages do people use to talk about these things? How many different terms do we use? 

## Auhelawa kin terms ## 

Among children of the same parent(s) 

* Male speaker, male addressee: tahi or tuwa
* Male speaker, female addressee: nuhu
* Female speaker, male addressee: nuhu
* Female speaker, female addressee: tahi or tuwa

Among grandchildren of the same grandparents: 

* The children of sisters call each other by the term ...
* The children of brothers call each other by the term ...
* The children of a brother and a sister call each other ...

## X and || ##

Because having two types of collateral relatives is so common around
the world, anthropologists use English etic (analytical) terms for
them:

**Cross-cousins** are the children of your parents' //opposite-sex//
siblings.

**Parallel cousins** are the children of your parents' //same-sex//
siblings. (And...?)

## And more ##

{{:natgeo.seri.sib.png|Lynn Johnson, Vanishing Voices Photo Slideshow, National Geographic, 2012}}

## The axiom of amity ##

Meyer Fortes: 

Kinship concepts, institutions, and relations classify, identify, and categorize persons and groups. ... [T]his is  associated with rules of conduct whose efficacy comes, in the last resort, from a general principle of kinship morality that is rooted in the familial domain and is assumed everywhere to be axiomatically binding. This is the rule of **prescriptive altruism** which I have referred to as the principle of kinship amity and which Hiatt calls the ethic of generosity. (Fortes 2004 [1969]: 231-232) 






## References ##

Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy
of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge.

Johnson, Lynn. 2012. Seri Cousins (Photograph). Vanishing Voices
Photo Gallery, National Geographic (July). http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/07/vanishing-languages/rymer-text