Ryan Schram
ANTH 1002: Anthropology in the world
Module 4, Week 2, Lecture 2
Social Sciences Building (A02), Room 410
ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au
October 30, 2019
Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/1002/2019/4.2.2
On Monday we discussed a basic paradox that all societies face: People are mortal, but societies are immortal. When a person dies, society as a whole has to act in order to go on.
In Portland, Oregon, an anthropology professor goes to the coffee shop, and conducts some impromptu ethnographic fieldwork. She hears:
I wonder what it is like to have a culture.
When I carried out fieldwork in Auhelawa, many people told me that their mortuary practices were kastam (custom, tradition), and a lot of people wished they would just go away.
Long's informants in the US and Japan are “forced to be free” (Rousseau 1978 [1762], 55).
In their own way, Auhelawa people were also “forced to be free” — by colonialism.
If social life is like the script of a play, and people play the roles in the script, then any cultural script needs to be shared.
As Long also argues, no single script is complete. People need to recruit other people to play the other parts in their script.
Yet other people have their own scripts, and will be looking for you to play a role in their script.
A few weeks ago, we discussed migration. At the time I said that many people operate with an assumption that their migration is circular (and contrary to the standard narrative of migration in the US, e.g. An American tail and An American tail II: Fievel goes west).
When migrants die away from home, they may be repatriated to their homelands to be buried. So in a sense their migration is circular. In spite of their untimely death, their migratory journey still functions within an overall social system. When people's bodies are sent home to be buried, there is an unexpected parallel to another case of secondary burial we discussed on Monday. What is it?
Go to Canvas and take Quiz 21: You can go home again.
The code will be announced in class.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1978 (1762). On the Social Contract, with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy. Edited by Roger D. Masters. Translated by Judith R. Masters. New York: St. Martin’s Press. http://archive.org/details/onsocialcontract00rous.
/
#