Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 3621:2024:3 [2024/01/16 00:09] – [Week 3—Communication as event] Ryan Schram (admin)
+++ 3621:2024:3 [2024/01/16 00:11] (current) – Ryan Schram (admin)
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 **Main reading:** Irvine (2012)
-**Other reading:** Ansell (2009); Berman (2020); Goodwin (2006); Harkness (2017); Hymes (1974); Irvine (1996); Jakobson ([1957] 1984)
+**Other reading:** Ansell (2009); Berman (2020); Goodwin (2006); Harkness (2017); Hymes (1974); Irvine (1996); Jakobson (1960)
 In this week, we delve more deeply into foundations of a social study of language, and especially what anthropology has to offer this study. Anthropologists join with sociolinguists on very general questions of language and society, but anthropology is based on ethnography, so its study of communication is to create ethnographies of communication. It’s a pretty compelling and counterintuitive idea: You can observe and document people communicating if you attend to every thing they do when they interact with each other.
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
-Jakobson, Roman. (1957) 1984. “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb.” In //Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies, 1931-1981//, edited by Linda R. Waugh and Morris Halle, 41–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822885.41.
+Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas Sebeok, 350–77. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. https://monoskop.org/images/8/84/Jakobson_Roman_1960_Closing_statement_Linguistics_and_Poetics.pdf.