2700:2022:8
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2700:2022:8 [2022/04/10 21:09] – removed Ryan Schram (admin) | 2700:2022:8 [2022/04/10 21:34] (current) – [A global system of territorial states is the fabric of our lives] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ~~DECKJS~~ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====== The politics of scale ====== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== The politics of scale ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ryan Schram\\ | ||
+ | ANTH 2700: Key debates in anthropology\\ | ||
+ | ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au\\ | ||
+ | Social Sciences Building 410 (A02)\\ | ||
+ | Week of April 11, 2022 (Week 8) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Slides available at http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Main reading:** Gupta and Ferguson (1992); Gupta (1995) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Other reading:** Verdery (1999) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== States of mind ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Why is it that the most influential world-pictures are made up of little puzzle pieces? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here are examples of headlines from the “World” sections of major newspapers: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * “India approves booster shots…” (Singh 2022) | ||
+ | * “Finland seizes artwork shipments…” (Bowley 2022) | ||
+ | * “Turkey transfers Khashoggi Murder trial…” (Timur and Hubbard 2022) | ||
+ | * “U.S. says it secretly removed malware…” (Conger and Sanger 2022) | ||
+ | |||
+ | And when they don’t use country names as a grammatical agent, they use a synedoche—a part that stands in for the whole: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * “The Pentagon says Russia fired the missiles…” (Schmitt 2022) | ||
+ | * “Inside Biden’s $5.8 trillion wish list. The White House’s latest budget proposal enumerates its biggest policy priorities.” (Sorkin et al. 2022) | ||
+ | * “Beijing’s handpicked candidate for Hong Kong signals tighter control” (Mahtani and Yu 2022) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== A global system of territorial states is the fabric of our lives ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This leads to several questions: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * How did we get here? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * What does it mean for our social existence as members of various communities? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Why does everyone take this for granted? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Is there an alternative? | ||
+ | |||
+ | This week and after break we will discuss ways to approach these questions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Ancient states and the contemporary system of states ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are two senses of the concept of //the state//, one general and one more specific and contemporary. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first sense of state is associated with an evolutionary schema of types: States are more complex than other forms like hereditary leadership. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The second sense applies to the emergence of a system of territorial units that each have exclusive sovereignty over their territories and their people. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== The concept of the state derives from a belief in a great divide in history ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The concept of the state itself is associated with a tradition in European thought of conceiving of history as a series of distinct eras, each representing a step forward in progress toward a better system. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Ferdinand Tönnies (Tönnies [1887] 1957) | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * Henry Maine (Maine [1861] 1963, 163–65) | ||
+ | * status (inherited position or membership in a group) | ||
+ | * contract (voluntary agreement between two people) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Max Weber, rationality, | ||
+ | |||
+ | While Durkheim and Marx also have their own theories of states, they aren’t that original. The most influential theorist of the contemporary state as a type is [[:Max Weber]], for whom it is crucially linked to his idea of [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Weber looks at society from the ground up, in terms of patterns of social action. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Forms of social action can be more or less rational, and can be rational in different ways. Social actions can be motivated by | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Tradition: This is the way it has always been done | ||
+ | * Emotion: This action expresses how I feel personally | ||
+ | * Value-rationality (// | ||
+ | * Instrumental rationality (// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== What can you do with an army of bureaucrats? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Weber argues that all social forms will gradually become more and more rational over time. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * An institution based on tradition or value-rationality will develop within itself a capacity to administer itself. | ||
+ | * It will develop a bureaucratic organization within itself. | ||
+ | * A bureaucracy is a system of offices governed by explicit rules, procedures, and policies. | ||
+ | * Because bureaucracies are rationally planned, the role of individual occupant of an office is merely to do a job, to follow rules. | ||
+ | * Bureaucracies are powerful. When a body of people can administer their own affairs using a permanent structure of offices, who needs a ruler? | ||
+ | |||
+ | A state is a central bureaucratic authority. It is defined as the organization that has a “monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force” (Weber [1921] 1946, 78). | ||
+ | |||
+ | * As legislator, regulator, and enforcer of the law, the state is an adminstration of administrations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== The limits of a theory of the modern state ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Weber’s concept of the so-called “modern” state is based on certain assumptions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | - It assumes that we can speak of a single state within a single territory, as if it exists in isolation. | ||
+ | * Most states today originate in the 20th century era of decolonization, | ||
+ | - The Weberian state is primarily interested in why a single state bureaucracy is seen as legitimate form of rule. Is state power the only or the most important way that people are ruled? | ||
+ | * For instance, while each state is nominally independent, | ||
+ | - Insofar as Weber’s idea of the state is based on his theory of rationalization of social action, it leads to another linear scale of progress, which is ethnocentric. | ||
+ | * The establishment of a bureacratic state anywhere is never simply the evolution of a new, bigger, and more rational form of order; it is always also the displacement of alternative forms of polity. | ||
+ | * When we ignore these forms of government and focus on rational decision making, then we assume that alternatives are failures or errors. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Do we need an anthropology of the state? ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Anthropology does not assume that is a universal concept of the state that applies everywhere; it assumes that everything is different. | ||
+ | - Anthropologists look beyond the formal, explicit rules and policies. Weber assumes that informal practices and tacit knowledge about getting things done are merely vestiges of older modes of social action. | ||
+ | - Unlike Weber, who assumes that an organization can be so rational that it is culture-free, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== The illusion of the state ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Where is the state? An anthropologist would however not assume that there is a single unitary state, floating above society. State power is a lot of different people doing a lot of different things | ||
+ | |||
+ | They are acting //as if// there is a single state, occupying a permanent position outside of social life. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Weber’s view of power is that it is ability for someone to get someone else do something they would not otherwise do. | ||
+ | * A bureaucracy has power because, Weber assumes, someone makes a decision, and the whole organization acts. | ||
+ | * An alternative idea of power comes from Michel Foucault. For Foucault, power is a force that flows through and connects people, and thus is held by no one in particular. | ||
+ | * Foucault reinterprets Jeremy Bentham’s idea for a perfect prison, a Panopticon (Foucault 1979, 200–202). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== References and further reading ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bowley, Graham. 2022. “Finland Seizes Artwork Shipments Suspected of Violating E.U. Sanctions on Russia.” //The New York Times//, April 7, 2022, sec. World. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Conger, Kate, and David E. Sanger. 2022. “U.S. Says It Secretly Removed Malware Worldwide, Pre-Empting Russian Cyberattacks.” //The New York Times//, April 6, 2022, sec. U.S. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Foucault, Michel. 1979. // | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Gupta, Akhil. 1995. “Blurred Boundaries: The Discourse of Corruption, the Culture of Politics, and the Imagined State.” //American Ethnologist// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Gupta, Akhil, and James Ferguson. 1992. “Beyond `Culture’: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Mahtani, Shibani, and Theodora Yu. 2022. “Beijing’s Handpicked Candidate for Hong Kong Signals Tighter Control.” // | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Maine, Henry Sumner. (1861) 1963. //Ancient law; its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas//. Boston: Beacon Press. http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Schmitt, Eric. 2022. “The Pentagon Says Russia Fired the Missiles That Hit Kramatorsk Station, Killing at Least 50 People.” //The New York Times//, April 8, 2022, sec. World. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Singh, Karan Deep. 2022. “India Approves Booster Shots for People Between the Ages of 18 and 60, but They Won’t Be Free.” //The New York Times//, April 8, 2022, sec. World. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Sorkin, Andrew Ross, Jason Karaian, Stephen Gandel, Michael J. de la Merced, Lauren Hirsch, and Ephrat Livni. 2022. “Inside Biden’s $5.8 Trillion Wish List.” //The New York Times//, March 29, 2022, sec. Business. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Timur, Safak, and Ben Hubbard. 2022. “Turkey Transfers Khashoggi Murder Trial to Saudi Arabia.” //The New York Times//, April 7, 2022, sec. World. https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Tönnies, Ferdinand. (1887) 1957. //Community and society [Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft]// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Verdery, Katherine. 1999. “Giving proper burial, reconfiguring space and time.” In //The political lives of dead bodies: reburial and postsocialist change//, 95–112. New York: Columbia University Press. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Weber, Max. (1921) 1946. “Politics as a Vocation.” In //From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology//, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{page> | ||
2700/2022/8.1649650179.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/04/10 21:09 by Ryan Schram (admin)