2700:2022:13
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2700:2022:13 [2022/05/23 00:51] – [Secret agents] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2700:2022:13 [2022/05/23 17:50] (current) – [Universal humanity and the colonization of consciousness] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* Life itself has no single, simple definition. The working assumption is that all living things are related through a single evolutionary origin. | * Life itself has no single, simple definition. The working assumption is that all living things are related through a single evolutionary origin. | ||
- | | + | |
- | * What if there was another origin of life on Earth, and a completely separate evolutionary tree branched out from that point. | + | * What if there was another origin of life on Earth, and a completely separate evolutionary tree branched out from that point? |
- | * These living things would appear to be nonliving to us, because they don’t have any common ancestors with us. | + | * These living things would appear to be nonliving to us, because they don’t have any common ancestors with us. |
Anthropology, | Anthropology, | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
* Auhelawa people have always seen themselves as //tomowa//, a type of being that exists alongside other beings seen and unseen. Today //tomowa// is a narrower category because people limit its meaning to the same as the English word //human//. | * Auhelawa people have always seen themselves as //tomowa//, a type of being that exists alongside other beings seen and unseen. Today //tomowa// is a narrower category because people limit its meaning to the same as the English word //human//. | ||
* Being tomowa is defined in opposition to nature, rather than coexistence with many different beings. | * Being tomowa is defined in opposition to nature, rather than coexistence with many different beings. | ||
- | * People take for granted that //papuwa// (Papuans) and //dimdim// (white people) are both //tomowa// because //papuwa// and //dimdim// are God’s children. By contrast, spirits and dwarfs are beliefs have about the world, not facts. | + | * People take for granted that //papuwa// (Papuans) and //dimdim// (white people) are both //tomowa// because //papuwa// and //dimdim// are God’s children. By contrast, spirits and dwarfs are beliefs |
A universal humanity is a basis for human equality: All people are equal because they are fundamentally the same. | A universal humanity is a basis for human equality: All people are equal because they are fundamentally the same. | ||
- | Yet this universalism also creates inequality of another kind: Alternative conceptions of oneself as a person don’t have the same credibility and authority as the dominant conception of the human subject as an individual. | + | Yet this universalism also creates inequality of another kind: Alternative conceptions of oneself as a person don’t have the same credibility and authority as the dominant conception of the human subject as an individual. |
+ | |||
+ | **“The problem with language is hierarchy, | ||
Should anthropology instead be based on multiple humanities? | Should anthropology instead be based on multiple humanities? | ||
Line 166: | Line 169: | ||
———. 1986. //Essays on Individualism: | ———. 1986. //Essays on Individualism: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Gibson, D. W. 2022. “Ngũgĩ in America.” //The Atlantic//, May 20, 2022. https:// | ||
2700/2022/13.1653292307.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/05/23 00:51 by Ryan Schram (admin)