2700:2021:4
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 2700:2021:4 [2021/03/19 20:02] – [References and further reading] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2700:2021:4 [2021/03/19 20:03] (current) – [Radcliffe-Brown’s structural functionalism] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| ===== Radcliffe-Brown’s structural functionalism ===== | ===== Radcliffe-Brown’s structural functionalism ===== | ||
| - | As an example, let’s look back to anthropology’s classical period and the work of [[A. R. Radcliffe-Brown]]. | + | As an example, let’s look back to anthropology’s classical period and the work of [[:A. R. Radcliffe-Brown]]. |
| * Radcliffe-Brown brought Durkheim’s ideas into British social anthropology to argue for a “structural functionalist” theory of society. | * Radcliffe-Brown brought Durkheim’s ideas into British social anthropology to argue for a “structural functionalist” theory of society. | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| How should anthropology respond to this claim? | How should anthropology respond to this claim? | ||
| - | ===== Extra slide: Anthropology and colonialism—Ignorance, | + | ===== Extra slide: Anthropology and colonialism—Ignorance, |
| Radcliffe-Brown’s (1952) offhand mention of Aboriginal experiences of colonial invasion as the “death” of their culture and social systems raises the question of what anthropologists thought about European colonialism, | Radcliffe-Brown’s (1952) offhand mention of Aboriginal experiences of colonial invasion as the “death” of their culture and social systems raises the question of what anthropologists thought about European colonialism, | ||
2700/2021/4.1616209321.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/03/19 20:02 by Ryan Schram (admin)