Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


2667:5

**This is an old revision of the document!**

View page as slide show

The Weber Thesis

The Weber Thesis

Ryan Schram

Mills 169 (A26)

ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au

April 2, 2015

Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2667/5

Readings

Haynes, Naomi. 2012. “Pentecostalism and the Morality of Money: Prosperity, Inequality, and Religious Sociality on the Zambian Copperbelt.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18 (1): 123–39. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9655.2011.01734.x.

Robbins, J. 1998. “Becoming Sinners: Christianity and Desire among the Urapmin of Papua New Guinea.” Ethnology 37 (4): 299–316. doi:10.2307/3773784.

Robbins, Joel. 2001. “God Is Nothing but Talk: Modernity, Language, and Prayer in a Papua New Guinea Society.” American Anthropologist, New Series, 103 (4): 901–12.

Cannell, Fenella. 2005. “The Christianity of Anthropology*.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11 (2): 335–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9655.2005.00239.x.

Other media

DuBois, Bastien. 2013. “Cargo Cult” (Trailer). https://vimeo.com/62094392.

A persisting question

We understand that Durkheim and Weber complement each other, but we are still stuck with a nagging question. Aren't some religions more appropriately understood from the point of view of an individual? What, in general, is the relationship between the individual side of religious belief and practice and the social or collective side?

Individualism and society

I want to take as given that some societies exhibit individualism as a chief value. Relationships and groups are ideally based on choice. People create their own paths in life.

By contrast other societies exhibit a different orientation. Societies based on all-encompassing social institutions such as kinship structure and hereditary leadership, for instance, tend to place obligations to the group over individual choice.

This does not mean that some societies are more free or have looser structures, or that other societies are more oppressive. Each type of society is based on different values. None are necessarily more or less oppressive.

Key ideas for this week

  • the rationality of salvation, specifically the concept of a “calling” or vocation.
    1. the disenchantment of the world
    2. the individual and society in Robbins and Haynes's work
    3. Pentecostalism

A guide to the unit

2667/5.1427603003.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/03/28 21:23 by Ryan Schram (admin)