2667:3
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2667:3 [2015/02/22 21:56] – [Weber's influence on anthropology] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2667:3 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Mills 169 (A26) | Mills 169 (A26) | ||
- | March 19, 2015 | + | March 16, 2016 |
+ | |||
+ | Available at http:// | ||
### Readings ### | ### Readings ### | ||
Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
Speigel, Alix. 2011. “Why Cleaned Wastewater Stays Dirty In Our Minds.” Morning Edition. National Public Radio. http:// | Speigel, Alix. 2011. “Why Cleaned Wastewater Stays Dirty In Our Minds.” Morning Edition. National Public Radio. http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Durkheim, continued ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | In his book, *The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life* (1915), Durkheim states that religion is society worshipping itself((While this catchy phrase is often attributed to Durkheim, as far as I know, it is not a quotation from *Elementary Forms*. However in the conclusion and at several points in the book he does equate society and the sacred in this way, and he says in the conclusion, "If religion has given birth to all that is essential in society, it is because the idea of society is the soul of religion" | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Some key terms of Durkheim ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Societies are wholes which are greater than the sum of their parts. A society is a **collective consciousness**, | ||
+ | * **Social facts** are collective representations (or ' | ||
+ | * **Solidarity** in one form or another is the substance of the social whole. Solidarity is the quality of being part of something larger, an integrated system which is greater than the sum of its parts. **Mechanical solidarity** is feeling like one belongs to a group where everyone is alike. **Organic solidarity** is feeling like one depends on people who depend on you, or that everyone occupies a position within a division of labor. | ||
+ | * Patterns of society, institutions, | ||
+ | * **Sacred and profane**: All societies must have at least one social fact, the distinction between sacred and profane. Sacred things are things set aside and forbidden. Profane things are normal, everyday things with no special meaning or importance. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Durkheim and relativism ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is Durkheim saying that the sacred is whatever people in a society say is sacred? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Why must a society worship itself? ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Durkheim observes that religious forms consist of both beliefs and practices. Sacred things need not merely be ideas or objects which people believe are sacred. Actions can be sacred too. What seems important to religious practice is that, unlike other everyday activities, there is a definite right way to do it, and this is connected to the sacred. Let's call this **ritual**, a pattern of action which is connected to the sacred. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ritual, or sacred action, is a kind of social fact. It is, furthermore, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Durkheim also observes that many societies' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Because a society must be greater than the people who make it up, then a society must have its own totality as a social fact. Through ritual, the social fact of the sacred appears to people in a symbolic form, as a god or as a mystical unity of nature, or as something which greater than mere mortals. This is in fact a symbol of society itself, a collective consciousness, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Line 44: | Line 76: | ||
* In an experiment, people who refused recycled water would accept it when they were told a story that included the idea that recycled water would sit underground for one year before entering the water system. | * In an experiment, people who refused recycled water would accept it when they were told a story that included the idea that recycled water would sit underground for one year before entering the water system. | ||
* Even in spite of the facts, people only could understand the process of recycling water through symbols. | * Even in spite of the facts, people only could understand the process of recycling water through symbols. | ||
- | * Symbols guide how people think and act. [[:Emile Durkheim]] and [[:Max Weber]] each offer explanations for why. | + | * Symbols guide how people think and act. [[:Emile Durkheim]] and [[:Max Weber]] each offer explanations for why. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## Different kinds of social actions ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Waiting for the train. Standing on the platform. | ||
+ | * Offering your seat to a pregnant woman. | ||
+ | * Buying a coffee for a friend. | ||
+ | * Sending a get-well card. | ||
+ | * Sending a text to Mom and Dad. | ||
+ | * Signing a petition. | ||
+ | * Donating money to [[https:// | ||
+ | * Buying ramen. | ||
## Max Weber and the action perspective on society ## | ## Max Weber and the action perspective on society ## | ||
* In order for society to exist, individuals must act, and patterns of action must develop. | * In order for society to exist, individuals must act, and patterns of action must develop. | ||
- | * Sociology should look at the basis for people' | + | * Sociology should look at the basis for people' |
- | * In another sense, Weber looks at society from the ground up, and asks how individuals fit into social systems. | + | * There are four main types of action: traditional, |
+ | |||
+ | * In another sense, Weber looks at society from the ground up, and asks how individuals fit into social systems. | ||
* Weber: " | * Weber: " | ||
Line 64: | Line 111: | ||
## Weber, Geertz and religion ## | ## Weber, Geertz and religion ## | ||
- | * Are you good? It is, in a sense, impossible to know on one's own. | + | * Are you good? It is, in a sense, impossible to know on one's own. You can never be sure. |
* Through manipulating symbols, one can reassure oneself one is OK, that one fits in, and one is normal. | * Through manipulating symbols, one can reassure oneself one is OK, that one fits in, and one is normal. | ||
- | * Avoiding | + | * For Sherpa people, and possibly all people, avoiding |
* According to Geertz, religion gives people " | * According to Geertz, religion gives people " | ||
## References ## | ## References ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: Allen and Unwin. | ||
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. " | Geertz, Clifford. 1973. " |
2667/3.1424670963.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/02/22 21:56 by Ryan Schram (admin)