Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


2654:1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
2654:1 [2014/07/22 20:30] – [The axiom of amity] Ryan Schram (admin)2654:1 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2654/1 Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2654/1
 +
 +## Who do you think you are? ##
 +
 +http://www.sbs.com.au/programs/who-do-you-think-you-are
 +
 +## Faces of America ##
 +
 +* http://www.pbs.org/wnet/facesofamerica/
 +* http://www.pbs.org/weta/finding-your-roots/
  
 ## Recap ## ## Recap ##
Line 45: Line 54:
 For Morgan, kinship is a "system of consanguinity and affinity." For Morgan, kinship is a "system of consanguinity and affinity."
  
-**Consanguinous**: related by blood, either through the mother or the+**Consanguinity**: related by blood, either through the mother or the
 father. father.
  
Line 86: Line 95:
  
 You can share answers with neighbors. What languages do people use to talk about these things? How many different terms do we use?  You can share answers with neighbors. What languages do people use to talk about these things? How many different terms do we use? 
 +
 +## Auhelawa kin terms ## 
 +
 +Among children of the same parent(s) 
 +
 +* Male speaker, male addressee: tahi or tuwa
 +* Male speaker, female addressee: nuhu
 +* Female speaker, male addressee: nuhu
 +* Female speaker, female addressee: tahi or tuwa
 +
 +Among grandchildren of the same grandparents: 
 +
 +* The children of sisters call each other by the term ...
 +* The children of brothers call each other by the term ...
 +* The children of a brother and a sister call each other ...
  
 ## X and || ## ## X and || ##
Line 107: Line 131:
 Meyer Fortes:  Meyer Fortes: 
  
-[K]inship concepts, institutions, and relations classify, identify, and categorize persons and groups. ... [T]his is associated with rules of conduct whose efficacy comes, in the last resort, from a general principle of kinship morality that is rooted in the familial domain and is assumed everywhere to be axiomatically binding. This is the rule of **prescriptive altruism** which I have referred to as the principle of kinship amity and which Hiatt calls the ethic of generosity. (Fortes 2004 [1969]: 231-232) +Kinship concepts, institutions, and relations classify, identify, and categorize persons and groups. ... [T]his is  associated with rules of conduct whose efficacy comes, in the last resort, from a general principle of kinship morality that is rooted in the familial domain and is assumed everywhere to be axiomatically binding. This is the rule of **prescriptive altruism** which I have referred to as the principle of kinship amity and which Hiatt calls the ethic of generosity. (Fortes 2004 [1969]: 231-232) 
  
  
2654/1.1406086249.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/07/22 20:30 by Ryan Schram (admin)