Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


1

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

1 [2014/07/21 18:38] – created Ryan Schram (admin)1 [2014/07/21 18:41] (current) – removed Ryan Schram (admin)
Line 1: Line 1:
-# Some history # 
- 
-## A history of kinship ## 
- 
-Ryan Schram  
- 
-ANTH 2654: Forms of Families 
- 
-July 31, 2014 
- 
-Available at http://anthro.rschram.org/2654/1 
- 
-## Recap ## 
- 
-There's lots of reasons to study kinship: 
- 
-* It raises questions about human nature. 
- 
-* It seems to explain the social structure of small societies. 
- 
-* Ideas about family often reveal implicit ideas about gender and 
-  morality. 
- 
-* "Multiculturalism" usually has something to do with the fact that 
-  different cultures have differ concepts of family, relatives, and 
-  their relationships. 
- 
-You should choose one reason why you're studying it. What questions do 
-you want answered? 
- 
-## He invented kinship ## 
- 
-Many ideas about kinship in anthropology trace back to the work of 
-**Lewis Henry Morgan**. Morgan gives the first justification for 
-studying kinship as a system of a society.  
- 
-Every society has its own way of dividing itself into groups and 
-deciding how these groups can relate to each other. The terms we use 
-to label relatives are classifications of people.  
- 
-## Morgan's definition of kinship ## 
- 
-For Morgan, kinship is a "system of consanguinity and affinity." 
- 
-**Consanguinous**: related by blood, either through the mother or the 
-father. 
- 
-**Affinity**: related by marriage, i.e. a spouse and all of the 
-spouse's consanguineous relatives. Roughly equivalent to English 
-'in-law'. 
- 
-## Set sail for kinship ##  
- 
-W. H. R. Rivers is another "discoverer of kinship" in anthropology. 
- 
-Rivers collected information about cultures by going out on long 
-expeditions. It was a time before "fieldwork." 
- 
-He found that he could gather a clear picture of a society as an 
-organized whole if he just asked a person to name all of their 
-relatives, and to trace their family tree back as far as one could 
-remember. He called it **the genealogical method**. 
- 
-Patterns of which relative married which relative were linked to 
-different types of social institution. 
- 
-## Culture shock ## 
- 
-Rivers helped create contemporary anthropology based on cultural 
-relativism. For him, marriage forms like **polyandry** and **child 
-marriage** were just as strange as **cousin marriage** among 
-upper-class British families. 
- 
-## A puzzle ## 
- 
-Take a piece of paper and write the term. What do you call: 
- 
-* What is your "native language"? 
-* Your **mother's sister's children**? 
-* Your **mother's brother's children**? 
-* Your **mother's children** (besides yourself)? 
-* Your **father's sister's children**? 
-* Your **father's brother's children**? 
-* Your **father's children**? (besides yourself)? 
- 
-You can share answers with neighbors. How many different terms do we use?  
- 
-## X and || ## 
- 
-Because having two types of collateral relatives is so common around 
-the world, anthropologists use English etic (analytical) terms for 
-them: 
- 
-**Cross-cousins** are the children of your parents' //opposite-sex// 
-siblings. 
- 
-**Parallel cousins** are the children of your parents' //same-sex// 
-siblings. (And...?) 
- 
-## And more ## 
- 
-{{:natgeo.seri.sib.png|Lynn Johnson, Vanishing Voices Photo Slideshow, National Geographic, 2012}} 
- 
-## The axiom of amity ## 
- 
-How to define kinship has been very controversial, as we shall 
-see. Many anthropologists tend to implicitly gravitate toward one 
-definition, though. It was formulated by **Meyer Fortes**, who writes: 
- 
-> [K]inship concepts, institutions, and relations classify, identify, 
-> and categorize persons and groups. ... [T]his is associated with 
-> rules of conduct whose efficacy comes, in the last resort, from a 
-> general principle of kinship morality that is rooted in the familial 
-> domain and is assumed everywhere to be axiomatically binding. This 
-> is the rule of **prescriptive altruism** which I have referred to as the 
-> principle of kinship amity and which Hiatt calls the ethic of 
-> generosity. (Fortes 2004 [1969]: 231-232) 
- 
-## References ## 
- 
-Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy 
-of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge. 
- 
-Johnson, Lynn. 2012. Seri Cousins (Photograph). Vanishing Voices 
-Photo Gallery, National Geographic (July). http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2012/07/vanishing-languages/rymer-text 
  
1.1405993134.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/07/21 18:38 by Ryan Schram (admin)