1002:3.1
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
1002:3.1 [2016/07/21 22:31] – [Two points about spheres] Ryan Schram (admin) | 1002:3.1 [2018/08/12 16:02] – [Gifts and commodities] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au | ryan.schram@sydney.edu.au | ||
- | Monday, August | + | Monday, August |
Available at http:// | Available at http:// | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Some things, like land, cannot be exchanged for anything, but are inherited. | Some things, like land, cannot be exchanged for anything, but are inherited. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Relationships can be organized into spheres, too ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can take the idea of spheres of exchange and apply it to the different ways people exchange: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Kula valuables (bagi, mwali) are a sphere of exchange. These objects can only be exchanged for each other, and not for anything else. | ||
+ | * Moreover, one only does kula with certain kula partners, and one must keep one's kula exchanges separate from other kinds of exchanges with other people, like barter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## The ikpanture relationship is sphere of exchange ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Piot describes the relationship among // | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The way you treat your // | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * One relies on // | ||
+ | * Ikpanture relationships are not //quid pro quo//. | ||
## Two points about spheres ## | ## Two points about spheres ## | ||
Line 57: | Line 73: | ||
2. Western and “modern” societies think of themselves as being dominated by money, but if you think about it, these societies have spheres of exchange too, and worry about maintaining the boundaries between spheres. | 2. Western and “modern” societies think of themselves as being dominated by money, but if you think about it, these societies have spheres of exchange too, and worry about maintaining the boundaries between spheres. | ||
- | ## A trading network | + | ## Moral limits on exchange |
+ | |||
+ | Gift systems are not static or unchanging. They adapt to contact with colonial power, money, and markets. They do so in different ways. | ||
- | [Map of PNG] | + | One way is by quarantining money and market exchange. For instance, |
- | ## Making pots in Salamaua ## | + | * Auhelawa market food but consider buying food to be shameful, |
+ | especially seeds. | ||
- | We the people | + | * In the past, Wedau people |
+ | bought steel tools, but prohibited | ||
+ | gardens. | ||
- | Now you all see the prices for all these things and then you all will get it right. So, prices for them are like this: If you see a pot for 4/-, then you [pay with?] two big pandanus of 4/-. If a pot for 2/-, then you pay with a pandanus of 2/-. The reason is you all always just bring pandanus and get pots. So, you all don’t know the price of these things. And so, we put them for the pots so that you all can see them. | ||
- | If a pot is 5/-, or L1, then you must pay directly with money. It is not good that you should give pandanus for 5/- and L1 and get a pot. You know that the work of a pot is not like the work of pandanus - Pots are harder work than pandanus, so you must pay directly for big pots with real money. | + | ## When a gift system meets a commodity system |
- | The work of pots is like this:- The very first thing, they must [dig?] the ground and they get really deep. After that, they bring it to the village | + | When a society organized on the basis of gifts encounters a globalizing capitalist market, many different outcomes are possible. In the next lecture |
- | We say this because you all have put down many things of yours - So we see this and so we Salamaua people, we support you all. Our message is finished. We all the people of Salamaua. | + | * Separation, tension, and conflict |
+ | * Efflorescence | ||
+ | * Transformation | ||
- | (“Lae Garamut” vol. II, no. 23) | ||