1002:2024:module_ii_essay
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| 1002:2024:module_ii_essay [2024/07/07 17:57] – [Grading criteria] Ryan Schram (admin) | 1002:2024:module_ii_essay [2024/07/07 18:04] (current) – Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| In your essay, present both cases and apply Mill’s method of agreement to make an argument for your main claim (or your thesis statement) that they share a fundamental underlying similarity. | In your essay, present both cases and apply Mill’s method of agreement to make an argument for your main claim (or your thesis statement) that they share a fundamental underlying similarity. | ||
| - | ==== Grading criteria ==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Your essay will be marked out of 100 possible points on how it measures up on several different aspects. See the common grading rubric (on Canvas) for the essay assignments in this class. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ==== Formatting and software requirements ==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | For a description of the required appearance and file format of a writing assignment, see the page [[|Formatting and software requirements]]. | ||
| ===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
1002/2024/module_ii_essay.1720400279.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/07/07 17:57 by Ryan Schram (admin)