Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


1002:2024:5.2

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
1002:2024:5.2 [2024/08/26 21:48] Ryan Schram (admin)1002:2024:5.2 [2024/08/26 21:55] (current) – [What kind of “social contract” have you lived under?] Ryan Schram (admin)
Line 55: Line 55:
 Select as many as apply to the household you grew up in. Select as many as apply to the household you grew up in.
  
-**Hypothesis**: Out class is very diverse and the “breadwinner” model only applies to some, but not all of us.+**Hypothesis**: Our class is very diverse and the “breadwinner” model only applies to some, but not all of us.
  
 ===== After Fordism, a new kind of global capitalism and a new kind of household ===== ===== After Fordism, a new kind of global capitalism and a new kind of household =====
Line 70: Line 70:
  
   * Kinship in the Fordist “private” domain of the nuclear family is still, as Carsten might say, something people do; it’s invisible to the rest of the world since doing kinship is seen as strictly women’s work.   * Kinship in the Fordist “private” domain of the nuclear family is still, as Carsten might say, something people do; it’s invisible to the rest of the world since doing kinship is seen as strictly women’s work.
-  * Even as the Fordist social contract collapses, people still adhere to this ideological representation of kinship as private. Women who work in dual-income households still do most if not all of the care work; they pull a “second shift” at home (**hochschild_second_1989-1?**).+  * Even as the Fordist social contract collapses, people still adhere to this ideological representation of kinship as private. Women who work in dual-income households still do most if not all of the care work; they pull a “second shift” at home (Hochschild 1989).
  
 ==== Families have responded to the breakdown of the Fordist social contract in different and unequal ways ==== ==== Families have responded to the breakdown of the Fordist social contract in different and unequal ways ====
Line 94: Line 94:
  
  
-Hochschild, Arlie. 2000. “Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value.” In //On the Edge: Globalization and the New Millennium//, edited by Anthony Giddens and Will Hutton, 130–46. London: SAGE Publications.+Hochschild, Arlie. 1989. //The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home//. New York: Penguin Books. 
 + 
 + 
 +———. 2000. “Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value.” In //On the Edge: Globalization and the New Millennium//, edited by Anthony Giddens and Will Hutton, 130–46. London: SAGE Publications.
  
  
1002/2024/5.2.1724734111.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/26 21:48 by Ryan Schram (admin)