1002:2022:6.2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
1002:2022:6.2 [2022/08/31 19:55] – Ryan Schram (admin) | 1002:2022:6.2 [2022/08/31 23:46] – [Fordist families in a post-Fordist era] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
* Even as the Fordist social contract collapses, people still adhere to this ideological representation of kinship as private. Women who work in dual-income households still do most if not all of the care work; they pull a “second shift” at home (Hochschild 1989). | * Even as the Fordist social contract collapses, people still adhere to this ideological representation of kinship as private. Women who work in dual-income households still do most if not all of the care work; they pull a “second shift” at home (Hochschild 1989). | ||
- | ==== Families | + | ==== Families have responded to the breakdown of the Fordist social contract in different and unequal ways ==== |
* Wealthy families commodify the acts of kinship by hiring domestic workers who work in the families’ homes, contributing to a system of “stratified reproduction” (Colen 1995). | * Wealthy families commodify the acts of kinship by hiring domestic workers who work in the families’ homes, contributing to a system of “stratified reproduction” (Colen 1995). | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
- | Fraser, Nancy. (1997) 2013. “After the Family Wage: A Postindustriell | + | Fraser, Nancy. (1997) 2013. “After the Family Wage: A Postindustrial |
1002/2022/6.2.txt · Last modified: 2022/09/01 16:31 by Ryan Schram (admin)