1002:2022:2.2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
1002:2022:2.2 [2022/07/19 01:08] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | 1002:2022:2.2 [2022/08/09 16:46] (current) – [Moka is a competitive system] Ryan Schram (admin) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
**Other reading:** Mauss ([1925] 1990) | **Other reading:** Mauss ([1925] 1990) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Reciprocity is a triple obligation ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[:Marcel Mauss]] argues that every society is a whole that is greater than the sum of its parts. The three obligations of reciprocity are symptoms of this: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The obligation to **give** | ||
+ | * The obligation to **receive** | ||
+ | * The obligation to **reciprocate**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Gifts have spirit ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | For Mauss, the Maori word //hau// means the “spirit of the thing given.” When someone gives a gift, they give part of themselves. “The //hau// wishes to return to its birthplace” (Mauss [1925b] 1990, 12). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Total services ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | What, then, is society? Mauss says that the essence of society is a “system of total services” in which everything one does is for someone else, and other people do everything for you. It is a state of total interdependence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Yam gardening in Auhelawa ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Auhelawa is a society of people living on the south coast of Duau (Normanby Island), off the eastern tip of Papua New Guinea. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Every family in Auhelawa produces most of their own food grown on their own lands, and the most important of these are | ||
+ | |||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * //halutu// (// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Yet although most of people’s effort and thinking goes into growing these yams, most of the // | ||
+ | |||
+ | The best //halutu// are also preserved. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Moka is a competitive system ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Kawelka //moka// (and the // | ||
+ | |||
+ | Agonistic means that the sides in an exchange are competing to give more services to the other, and to raise the stakes of reciprocity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Competing for prestige versus gaining profit? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Reciprocity is everywhere ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Gift economies are not simply societies in which there’s a lot of gifts. A gift economy is a society in which reciprocity is a “total social phenomenon.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even societies which have created the possibility of individualism still have gifts and still have reciprocity. | ||
===== References and further reading ===== | ===== References and further reading ===== | ||
Line 22: | Line 65: | ||
- | Mauss, Marcel. (1925) 1990. “Selections from introduction, | + | Mauss, Marcel. (1925a) 1990. “Selections from introduction, |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ———. (1925b) 1990. //The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies// | ||
1002/2022/2.2.1658218120.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/07/19 01:08 by 127.0.0.1