Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 1002:2020:types-of-pubs [2020/08/18 19:40] – external edit 127.0.0.1
+++ 1002:2020:types-of-pubs [2020/08/18 19:56] (current) – Ryan Schram (admin)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Types of scholarly writing ======
-<HTML>
-<figure>
-</HTML>
-<html><img src="" alt=""/></html>
-<HTML>
-<figcaption style="font-size: 0.8em;color:#779">
-</HTML>
-An illustration of a cockatoo in a manuscript based on Islamic sources, indicating the contact between the Islamic world and Australasia in the 13th century C.E. (Frederick II 1258, 18v; see also Dalton et al. 2018).
-<HTML>
-</figcaption>
-</figure>
-</HTML>
 As you know, every week you have something to read. We usually call this a “reading,” and that’s fine. But it is also somebody’s “writing.” Scholars usually present their ideas and the results of their research by writing about it. Often their writing is not intended for students (although the truly great scholars are able to explain their ideas in words that anyone can understand, and we do try to find this kind of work for class). But if they weren’t writing for students, what were they trying to do?
@@ Line 26: / Line 13: @@
 Cliggett, Lisa. 2003. “Gift Remitting and Alliance Building in Zambian Modernity: Old Answers to Modern Problems.” //American Anthropologist// 105 (3): 543–52. doi:[[https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543|10.1525/aa.2003.105.3.543]].
-Dalton, Heather, Jukka Salo, Pekka Niemelä, and Simo Örmä. 2018. “Frederick II of Hohenstaufen’s Australasian Cockatoo: Symbol of Detente Between East and West and Evidence of the Ayyubids’ Global Reach.” //Parergon// 35 (1): 35–60. doi:[[https://doi.org/10.1353/pgn.2018.0002|10.1353/pgn.2018.0002]].
-Frederick II. 1258. “De Arte Venandi Cum Avibus.” https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Pal.lat.1071.