Ryan Schram's Anthrocyclopaedia

Anthropology presentations and learning resources

User Tools

Site Tools


1001:2021:13

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
1001:2021:13 [2021/06/01 00:04] Ryan Schram (admin)1001:2021:13 [2021/06/01 00:06] (current) – [How might ethnography speak to its own object?] Ryan Schram (admin)
Line 151: Line 151:
 More recently, scholars have revived Ortner’s skeptical label of “ethnographic refusal” and argued for a positive interpretation. More recently, scholars have revived Ortner’s skeptical label of “ethnographic refusal” and argued for a positive interpretation.
  
-When they use the term, they mean refusal to represent specific topics in pubilshed academic ethnographic writings, and instead collaborate with their informants on ways to for them to speak for themselves and create knowledge about themselves that is valuable for their community (Simpson 2007) * Intellectual ownership * Secrecy * Refusal to make people into ethnographic objects+When they use the term, they mean refusal to represent specific topics in pubilshed academic ethnographic writings, and instead collaborate with their informants on ways to for them to speak for themselves and create knowledge about themselves that is valuable for their community (Simpson 2007)  
 + 
 +* Intellectual ownership  
 +* Secrecy  
 +* Refusal to make people into ethnographic objects
  
 ===== What makes community-led research successful? ===== ===== What makes community-led research successful? =====
1001/2021/13.txt · Last modified: 2021/06/01 00:06 by Ryan Schram (admin)