2654:2
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2654:2 [2014/08/04 21:40] – [Some more terms] Ryan Schram (admin) | 2654:2 [2021/06/29 02:27] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ANTH 2654: Forms of Families | ||
- | August | + | August |
Available at http:// | Available at http:// | ||
- | ## " | + | ## Alternative classrooms |
- | Malinowski | + | {{: |
- | ## Two ideas, two perspectives | + | ## A new kind of lecture |
- | **Malinowski**: Kinship systems are different ways of satisfying the same need for family connection and nurture of children. If different relatives are called by the same term, this is because the prinary term has been extended to apply to a more distant relative, e.g. Kiriwina | + | The " |
- | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | + | Why do people want to do this? |
- | **Morgan**: Kinship systems are derived from the kinds of property that people can own. More generally, kinship is a way for a group to organize its members into different groups. | + | What do you think this would be like as a student? |
- | We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | + | How does this work in anthropology? |
- | ## Two more perspectives ## | ||
- | There is a common core to all kinship systems, based on universal traits. These can be innate, inherited qualities, or they could be universal requirements of group membership. | + | ## Kinship live ## |
- | There are no necessary elements in a kinship system. Each one is unique and specific to the culture in which one finds it. | + | http://www.pbs.org/ |
- | ## Some more terms ## | + | http:// |
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | What makes these TV shows popular? What do audiences see in them? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Kinship as a classification system ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Henry Maine: status, contract | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lewis Henry Morgan: gens, state. | ||
+ | |||
+ | W. H. R. Rivers: The genealogical method, an inventory of social statuses. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bronislaw Malinowski, founder of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | In a 1930 paper in the journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (then called //Man//), he wrote: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > [I have my doubts] whether the effort needed to master the bastard algebra of kinship is really worth while. [...] | ||
+ | > After all, kinship is a matter of flesh and blood, the result of sexual passion and maternal affection, of long | ||
+ | > intimate daily life, and of a host of personal intimate interests. Can all this really be reduced to formulas | ||
+ | > symbols, perhaps equations? (1930: 19) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Anthropology aspires to become a mathematics of society. Should it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## Key terms ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Consanguineous**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Affinal**: | ||
**Filiation**: | **Filiation**: | ||
Line 46: | Line 80: | ||
- | ## Why have fathers? ## | ||
- | Well? | + | ## Two ideas, two perspectives ## |
+ | |||
+ | **Malinowski**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We have to examine kinship from the bottom-up, in terms of the real, practical (and emotional) circumstances of its experience. Discover "the native' | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Morgan**: Kinship systems are derived from the kinds of property that people can own. More generally, kinship is a way for a group to organize its members into different groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We should approach kinship systems as total systems. Societies with classificatory systems of terminology tend to based on the //gens//. Kinship is society! | ||
+ | |||
+ | ## The axiom of amity ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Meyer Fortes**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | > Kinship concepts, institutions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ## Postscript ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the region where Susana de Matos Viegas carried out field research in Bahia, Brazil: https:// | ||
## References ## | ## References ## | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fortes, Meyer. 2004 [1969]. Kinship and the Social Order: The Legacy of Lewis Henry Morgan. London: Routledge. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1930. “17. Kinship.” Man 30: 19–29. doi: | ||
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1932 [1922]. Argonauts of The Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd. http:// | Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1932 [1922]. Argonauts of The Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: George Routledge and Sons, Ltd. http:// | ||
2654/2.1407213625.txt.gz · Last modified: 2014/08/04 21:40 by Ryan Schram (admin)